Case Summary
The petitioners are Raghi.L.S and Rahul, while the respondents include Sreekantan Pillai and others. The case concerns a petition for proper adjudication.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for proper adjudication.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
The court is inclined to allow the petition.
Judgment Evidence:
Petition allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raghi.L.S
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rahul
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekantan Pillai
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sumangala Pillai @ Sumangala Amma
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreekala @ Sunitha
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Suseela Amma
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ambika Amma
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Usha Devi. K.C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The court decided to allow the petition.
Evidence:
I am inclined to allow petition. Petition allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.
Case Code Year
2025