Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 426/2021

Case between Radhakrishnan K N vs K K Abraham et al regarding restraining from denying common facilities.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-10-15
Duration
approximately-4 years 4 months
Case Code No.
426
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Radhakrishnan K N, the petitioner and 5th defendant, seeks to restrain the first four defendants from denying common facilities provided to him. The petitioner contested against the unilateral fixing of monthly maintenance charges by the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The order was reviewed and the court has decided to restrain the defendants from denying common amenities to the 5th defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The order was reviewed and the court has decided to restrain the defendants from denying common amenities to the 5th defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
It was determined that the unilateral fixing of maintenance charges could cause irreparable loss to the residents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
It was determined that the unilateral fixing of maintenance charges could cause irreparable loss to the residents.
Supporting Evidence
It would cause irreparable loss and injury to all the residents if the monthly maintenance charges were fixed unilaterally.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence it would be fare and just to restrain the defendants no. 1 to 4 from denying the common amenities to the defendant no. 5 in the flat.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radhakrishnan K N
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K K Abraham
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S P Mathai
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Cyril Podipara
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jaya George
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raju Rajasekharan Nair
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sajan A Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P A Rabeez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Tharakan and George Associates
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
to restrain the defendants no. 1 to 4 from denying the common amenities to the defendant no. 5 in the flat
Evidence:
Hence it would be fare and just to restrain the defendants no. 1 to 4 from denying the common amenities to the defendant no. 5 in the flat.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Thu, 06/10/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Nishana K C regarding decree of suit
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asset Sapphire Apartment Owners Association vs Amal Shaji et al regarding petition for document production
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aniyamma Joseph et al vs Akhil Joseph et al regarding civil matters.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ajitha Jibi vs Sherin Mathew et al regarding compromise petition.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Daniel. K.P. et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won