Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 2 OF 2015

Case between Rabiya vs Kunnathparambil Alavi Basheer regarding eviction for Furniture business

Court
Court of the Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2018-03-07
Duration
3 years 2 months
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Rabiya seeks eviction of respondent Alavi Basheer to start a Furniture business in a commercial area.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted eviction and directed the respondent to provide vacant possession of the building to the petitioner within three months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction under Section 11(3) & 11(4)(iii) of Kerala Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
Case Type
Eviction under Kerala Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent remained exparte, and the evidence provided by the petitioner remained unchallenged, supporting the bonafide need for eviction.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed under section 11(3) & of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, directing the respondent to provide vacant possession of the building to the petitioner within three months from the date of the order.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rabiya (45 years) Nagar, P.O. Moonniyur South, 676 311

Defendants

Kunnathparambil Alavi Basheer (48 years) P.O. Thalakkad, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner granted eviction under Section 11(3) & 11(4)(iii) of Kerala Building (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed under section 11(3) & of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, directing the respondent to provide vacant possession of the building to the petitioner within three months from the date of the order.
Relief Type: Cost Recovery
Outcome: Unknown
Description:
Petitioner entitled to realize the cost of the petition from the respondent.
Evidence:
Not specified in the judgment.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cash Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as a document in support of the petition.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Commission report submitted by Smt. Neethu.P.T., Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Commission plan submitted by Smt. Neethu.P.T., Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases