Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No. 61/2024

Case between Rabiya Pookkottu vs Aabid K. regarding U/s.138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Court
Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Nadapuram
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan B.
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration
approximately-1 year 10 months
Case Closed
Wed, 08/13/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rabiya Pookkottu filed a complaint against Aabid K. for failing to return a borrowed amount of Rs.13,00,000/-. The case revolves around the dishonor of cheques issued by the accused.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found the accused guilty of the offense under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was sentenced to imprisonment and a fine.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The accused is sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a fine of 26,00,000 ₹/-.
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court found the accused guilty of the offense under S.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was sentenced to imprisonment and a fine.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant established that the cheques were executed for a legally enforceable debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The complainant established that the cheques were executed for a legally enforceable debt.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant has successfully established the formalities with regard to the institution of the complaint.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the accused is sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a fine of 26,00,000 ₹/- (Rupees Twenty Six Lakhs Only) U/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rabiya Pookkottu
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aabid K.
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Cheque No. 890474, Cheque Return Memo, Cheque No. 890475, Cheque Return Memo, Registered Lawyer notice, Postal Receipt, Postal Acknowledgment Card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Hareesh E. Karayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. Siju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation for the amount due from the accused.
Evidence:
The accused is sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment till rising of the court and to pay a fine of 26,00,000₹/- (Rupees Twenty Six Lakhs Only) U/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Simple Imprisonment in default of fine payment.
Evidence:
In default of payment of fine, the accused shall undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of six months.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque for Rs.6,50,000 issued by the accused to the complainant as a part of the debt repayment.
Reference:
P1
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo indicating that the cheque P1 was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
P2
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another cheque for Rs.6,50,000 issued by the accused to the complainant for the debt repayment.
Reference:
P3
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo indicating that the cheque P3 was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
P4
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent by the complainant to the accused regarding the default on the cheques.
Reference:
P5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt showing that the lawyer's notice was sent to the accused.
Reference:
P6
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card indicating that the lawyer's notice was returned unserved.
Reference:
P7

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Rabiya Pookkottu vs Aabid K. regarding U/s.138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Case Code Year
Case between Rabiya Pookkottu vs Aabid K. regarding U/s.138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act
Imprisonment Duration
6 months

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 10/21/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/13/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Faisal vs Rahees regarding dishonor of cheque under the Negotiable Instruments Act
Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Nadapuram
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Moosa S/o Aboobacker Haji vs Sajeevan S/o Kumaran regarding dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between P. Muhammadali vs Ameer Kattaroli regarding U/s.138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Nadapuram
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil vs Shamsu regarding dishonor of cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
COURT OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS-II, NADAPURAM
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won
Case between M. K. Abdul Rahman vs Hameed P. K. regarding U/s.138 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class-II, Nadapuram
Criminal Case Plaintiff Won