Case Summary
R. Venkiteseara Pai filed a petition against Ramesh M. under the Rent Control Act. The petitioner was absent, and the court dismissed the petition for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition under Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- R. Venkiteseara Pai
- Party Age
- 77
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ramesh M.
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rama Narayana Prabhu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sudha S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Petition under Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between R. Venkiteseara Pai vs Ramesh M. regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
Case Code Year
Case between R. Venkiteseara Pai vs Ramesh M. regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965