Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 74/2023

Case between R. Venkiteseara Pai vs Ramesh M. regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

R. Venkiteseara Pai filed a petition against Ramesh M. under the Rent Control Act. The petitioner was absent, and the court dismissed the petition for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition under Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

R. Venkiteseara Pai (77 years) H.NO. 67/9435, Gopala Prabhu Road, Ernakulam, Kochi-682035

Defendants

Ramesh M. (43 years) M/s. Aditi Textile, C.C. Door No. 67/9434, Gopala Prabhu Road, Ernakulam, Kochi-682035

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kochi
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases