Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 727/2021

Case between R. Manoj Kumar et al vs Viswanathan et al regarding compromise petition

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-05-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are R. Manoj Kumar and others, while the defendants include Viswanathan and his family. The case involved a compromise petition that has been allowed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the case in terms of the compromise, which will form part of the decree and judgment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the compromise petition and decreed the case in terms of the compromise, which will form part of the decree and judgment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Allowed. Decreed in terms with the compromise. Compromise shall form part of decree and judgment.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
R. Manoj Kumar
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Satheesh Mohan
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Reshmi P
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pavithra Manoj
Party Age
25
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nanditha Manoj
Party Age
20
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Viswanathan
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arjun C.V
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajeswari C.V
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abraham K John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rahul Govind
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Uthara Asokan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B. Jayaprakash
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Renju John
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suja R Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Thresia Anu P.J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Allowed the compromise petition and decreed in terms with the compromise.
Evidence:
Compromise petition I.A 8/24 filed. Allowed. Decreed in terms with the compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between R. Manoj Kumar et al vs Viswanathan et al regarding compromise petition
Case Code Year
Case between R. Manoj Kumar et al vs Viswanathan et al regarding compromise petition

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 05/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Fri, 05/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won