Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 123/2024

Case between P.V.Karunakaran vs Surendran regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-08-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.V.Karunakaran filed a suit against Surendran. The case was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff. An interim attachment previously ordered was lifted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff. An interim attachment previously ordered was lifted.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.V.Karunakaran
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Surendran
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.K.Kishor
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Devi P Prathapan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashna Aloysious
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anusha George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anuvinda M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Santhosh G Prabhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswathy A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Deepa N.U
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Not press memo seen filed by the plaintiff. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim attachment ordered in IA 2/24 shall stand lifted.
Evidence:
Interim attachment ordered in IA 2/24 shall stand lifted.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
IA 5/25 is allowed.
Evidence:
IA 5/25 seen filed. Allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.V.Karunakaran vs Surendran regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between P.V.Karunakaran vs Surendran regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won