Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 53/2023

Case between P.V. Subhash Chandran vs Krishnadas K. regarding Lease and Rent Control

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.V. Subhash Chandran filed a petition against Krishnadas K. under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The matter was settled between the parties through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the terms of the mediation agreement and allowed the petition. No costs are awarded.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The petition is allowed and order is passed in terms of mediation agreement dated 18.12.2023.
Case Type
Lease and Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the terms of the mediation agreement and allowed the petition. No costs are awarded.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the terms of the mediation agreement lawful and accepted them.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the terms of the mediation agreement lawful and accepted them.
Supporting Evidence
The court found the terms of mediation agreement dated 18.12.2023 lawful, hence accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is allowed and order is passed in terms of mediation agreement dated 18.12.2023.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.V. Subhash Chandran
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnadas K.
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation agreement dated 18.12.2023
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajesh Vijayendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sidhiqul Akbar K.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.P. Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
The petition is allowed and order is passed in terms of mediation agreement dated 18.12.2023.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court accepted the terms of the mediation agreement dated 18.12.2023.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Lease and Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.V. Subhash Chandran vs Krishnadas K. regarding Lease and Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between P.V. Subhash Chandran vs Krishnadas K. regarding Lease and Rent Control

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between O P Divakaran vs Latha Manoharan regarding Building Lease and Rent Control
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV
Lease and Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between N. Nirmal Kumar Shenoi et al vs Vikas. V.Shenoy regarding Petition filed under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act 1965
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Lease and Rent Control Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won