Case Summary
The suit involves a dispute over the partition of ancestral property between the children of Puzhavakkath Muhammed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiffs
Relief Granted
Partition of the Plaint B schedule property as per specific shares detailed in the judgment
Case Type
Original Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Civil death of Imbichu is presumed as he has been unheard of for 77 years, making the plaintiffs and defendants the sole legal heirs entitled to his share of the property.
Civil death of Imbichu is presumed as he has been unheard of for 77 years, making the plaintiffs and defendants the sole legal heirs entitled to his share of the property.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 18 equal shares by mets and bounds. 2. The plaintiff No 1,2,4,5,7,8,9,and 10 is entitled to get 1 share each out of 18 shares in plaint B schedule property...
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Puzhavakkath Muhammed @ Bappu (Age not specified years)
Thalakkadu amsom desom, P.O.B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 102
Puzhavakkath Sharafudheen (57 years)
Thalakkadu amsom desom, P.O.B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 102
Beerayumma (50 years)
Thalakkadu amsom desom, P.O.B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 102
Kunhassan Marakkarakath Rukhiya (48 years)
Niramaruthoor amsom desom, P.O.Niramaruthoor, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676109
Areekkattu Parambil Fathima (45 years)
Thirunnavaya amsom desom, Thiruthi, P.O. Thirunnavaya
Parappoor Naseema (43 years)
Thalakkadu amsom desom, Kannam kulam, P.O.B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 102
Defendants
Puzhavakkath Muhammed @ Bappu (Age not specified years)
Thalakkadu amsom desom, P.O.B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 102
Hussain (56 years)
Thrikkandiyur amsom Annara desom, P.O.Tirur, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 101
Souda Bai (Age not specified years)
Puzhavakkath House, Thrikkandiyur amsom Annara desom, P.O.Tirur, Tirur Taluk. PIN 676 101
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Partition of the Plaint B schedule property among plaintiffs and defendants based on specific shares detailed in the judgment
Evidence:
In the result the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaint B schedule property shall be divided into 18 equal shares by mets and bounds...
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Assignment of property from common ancestor to Muhammed @ Bappu
Reference:
Doc.No.2366/1947
Document Type:
Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Subsequent assignment of property to Thanikkad Abubacker
Reference:
Doc.No.384/1949
Document Type:
Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further assignment of property in favor of Muhammed @ Bappu
Reference:
Doc.No.1905/1951
Document Type:
Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Transfer of property to children of Abdul khader
Reference:
Doc.No.914/1965
Document Type:
Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Transfer of property from third plaintiff and second defendant
Reference:
Doc.No.143/1993