Case Summary
Petitioner filed a petition for the division of property as per the preliminary decree for partition issued in 2014.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The final decree for partition was passed allocating specific portions of the property to different parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Advocate Commissioner divided the property equitably as per the preliminary decree.
The Advocate Commissioner divided the property equitably as per the preliminary decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The Advocate Commissioner divided the property equitably as per the preliminary decree.
The Advocate Commissioner divided the property equitably as per the preliminary decree.
Supporting Evidence
No specific reasoning paragraph provided.
Judgment Evidence:
The petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows:-i. Property having an extent of 8.10 cents shown as plot BHJKLEG in Ext.C2 sketch is allotted together to the share of plaintiff, defendant No.2,4,6,7 and 9 to 17.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Puthumannil Avarankutty
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o. Moossakkutty Haji
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Puthumannil Moossakkutty Haji's children
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pottachola Moideenkutty
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o. Kunhimoidu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Valthodi Moideen Haji's Children
Plaintiffs Documents
No documents mentioned
Defendants Documents
No documents mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E.C. Suresh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. Chandrasekharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Final decree for partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Division of property as per preliminary decree
Evidence:
The petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows:-i. Property having an extent of 8.10 cents shown as plot BHJKLEG in Ext.C2 sketch is allotted together to the share of plaintiff, defendant No.2,4,6,7 and 9 to 17.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Puthumannil Avarankutty et al vs Puthumannil Moossakkutty Haji's children et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Puthumannil Avarankutty et al vs Puthumannil Moossakkutty Haji's children et al regarding partition