Case Summary
The plaintiff, Puthiyamadathil Hussainkutty, is suing the defendant, M.M.Anandan, for recovery of money due to unpaid license fees and unauthorized occupation of a shop room. The case involves a license agreement that the defendant failed to adhere to, leading to this legal action.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay ₹3,60,000 with interest and ₹10,000 per month until vacating the property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay a total of ₹3,60,000 with interest and additional compensation of ₹10,000 per month until vacating the premises.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence provided by the plaintiff was unchallenged and supported by the license agreement.
The evidence provided by the plaintiff was unchallenged and supported by the license agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence provided by the plaintiff was unchallenged and supported by the license agreement.
The evidence provided by the plaintiff was unchallenged and supported by the license agreement.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 coupled with Ext.A1 remains unchallenged. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree as sought for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹3,60,000 with interest at 9 per cent per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest at 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiff.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Puthiyamadathil Hussainkutty
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.M.Anandan
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
License agreement dated 10.06.2011
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Noushad Kallada
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹3,60,000 with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1)The defendant is directed to pay an amount of ₹3,60,000 with interest at 9 per cent per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type:
Compensation
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff shall be entitled to realize Rs 10,000 per month from the defendant until he vacates the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
2) The plaintiff shall be entitled to realize Rs 10,000 per month from the defendant from 06.11.2019 till he vacates the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
3) The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
License Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the agreement under which the defendant was allowed to use the plaint schedule room and is central to the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Puthiyamadathil Hussainkutty vs M.M.Anandan regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Puthiyamadathil Hussainkutty vs M.M.Anandan regarding recovery of money