Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 255/2025

Case between PUTHANPEEDIKAYIL BASHEER et al vs SHAHINATH PUTHANPEEDIKAYIL et al regarding property delivery

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-12-12
Duration
Case Code No.
255
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

PUTHANPEEDIKAYIL BASHEER and others are the petitioners seeking execution of a court decree. The petition relates to the delivery of property as per the decree.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the delivery of property and recorded full satisfaction of the decree. The execution petition is closed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Property delivered
Case Type
Civil Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery of property and recorded full satisfaction of the decree. The execution petition is closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The decree holder represented and fulfillment of the decree was confirmed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The decree holder represented and fulfillment of the decree was confirmed.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder represented. Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

This petition filed under Order XXI Rule 35 of the code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
PUTHANPEEDIKAYIL BASHEER
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
AYISHA HAMEED
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
RASHEED
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SHAHINATH PUTHANPEEDIKAYIL
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SIRAJ
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
MARIYAM
Party Age
70
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Arunkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Full satisfaction recorded and EP closed.
Evidence:
Property delivered. Full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between HABEEB THAZHAVADAKKAYIL vs KUNHAMI et al regarding execution of decree
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Civil Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kavilumpara Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society vs Saseendran PP et al regarding decree debt
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between GANGADHARAN vs AHAMMAD regarding satisfaction of decree
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between PURAMERI PANCHAYATH VANITHA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO. D. 2955 et al vs NIDHIN. M. M, DAMODHARAN. P regarding enforcement of award.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T K Abdul Salam vs Kunhammad regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Execution Petition Unknown