O.S No. 1248/2015

Case between Pushpavally vs Unnikrishnan et al regarding dismissal for default

Court

THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Nanda Krishna M.

Order Date

2025-01-10

Duration

approximately-9 years 26 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)

Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Pushpavally as the plaintiff and Unnikrishnan and SreeGopal as defendants. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff, who did not present any proof affidavit. The suit was ongoing since 2015.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to appear in court.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Pushpavally (67 years years) 49/695 C RRWA46, Rajeev Nagar, Elamakkara, Kochi

Defendants

Unnikrishnan (Age not specified years) 49/695A, Puthuvelil, Rajeev nagar, Elamakkara, Kochi SreeGopal (Age not specified years) Kausthubham, 445/695, Rajeev Nagar, Elamakkara, Kochi

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence

Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default.