Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 496/2024

Case between Pushpalal.V.C et al vs Aikyam Residents Association et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves two plaintiffs, Pushpalal.V.C and Sanal John Nediyathara, against the Aikyam Residents Association and its officers. The plaintiffs decided not to press the suit, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were not pressing it further.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were not pressing it further.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to lack of prosecution by the plaintiffs.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to lack of prosecution by the plaintiffs.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs decided not to press the suit, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pushpalal.V.C
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sanal John Nediyathara
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aikyam Residents Association
Relation
Rep. by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijayakumar.K.M
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhoshkumar
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony John Kadamparambil
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sanil Kunjachan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Praveen Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
counsel for plaintiff submits that he is not pressing the suit and endorsed the same in the plaint.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pushpalal.V.C et al vs Aikyam Residents Association et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Pushpalal.V.C et al vs Aikyam Residents Association et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won