Case Summary
The petitioner, Purushan.P.P., seeks a mandatory injunction to access a pathway as per a family partition deed. The defendants, consisting of multiple individuals, contest this claim, denying the petitioner's entitlement to the relief sought.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to prove entitlement to the pathway as claimed.
The petitioner failed to prove entitlement to the pathway as claimed.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, IA stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Purushan.P.P. (62 years years)
Parakkattil House, Amballur village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District
Defendants
Thankamani (79 years years)
Palathinkal parambil House, Mulamthuruthy P.O., Pin- 682 314, Mulamthuruthy Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District
Parameswaran (76 years years)
Parakkattil House, Amballur village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682 315
Ramakrishnan (73 years years)
Parakkattil House, Amballur. P.O., Amballur village, Kanayannur Taluk, Emakulam District, Pin- 682 315
Ammini (54 years years)
Chakkuparambil House, Cherthala P.O., Velarvattom, Cherthala village, Cherthala Taluk, Alappuzha District, Pin - 688 524
Rajan. P. V (62 years years)
Parakkattil House, Amballur P.O., Amballur village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 315
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought a temporary mandatory injunction to open a pathway for access to the public road.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that this petition is to be dismissed and is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court referred to the commission report to assess the existence of a pathway, which was a crucial aspect of the petition.
Reference:
Ext.C1