Case Summary
Pulinganchery Muhammed filed a petition against Musthafa regarding a rent control matter. The case was dismissed for default due to no representation from the petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed due to the lack of representation by the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner did not appear and failed to serve notice to the respondent.
Petitioner did not appear and failed to serve notice to the respondent.
Why Defendant Won:
Petitioner did not appear and failed to serve notice to the respondent.
Petitioner did not appear and failed to serve notice to the respondent.
Supporting Evidence
No representation for petitioner. Steps not taken to serve notice to respondent so far.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, RCP dismissed for default (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 07th October, 2025)
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pulinganchery Muhammed
- Party Age
- 90
- Relation
- S/o.Late Mammu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Musthafa
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o.C.H Muhammed Moulavi
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.E.V.Viswambaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
RCP dismissed for default due to non-representation and failure to serve notice to respondent.
Evidence:
Hence, RCP dismissed for default
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pulinganchery Muhammed vs Musthafa regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Pulinganchery Muhammed vs Musthafa regarding Rent Control