Case Summary
The case involves P.U Ziyad as the plaintiff and Sunilkumar N.G as the defendant. The petition was filed to allow a document to be submitted after the plaintiff's evidence had closed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition as the affidavit could not be believed or relied upon.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
This petition is therefore dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.U Ziyad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Law Firm
- Presidency Crown Heights
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sunilkumar N.G
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Law Firm
- Eroor
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S. K Harish
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Chithra R. Shenoy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The petition was dismissed as the affidavit cannot be believed or relied upon.
Evidence:
This petition is therefore dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.U Ziyad et al vs Sunilkumar N.G regarding petition for document submission.
Case Code Year
Case between P.U Ziyad et al vs Sunilkumar N.G regarding petition for document submission.