Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 697/2023

Case between Preethy Davis vs Regional Sports Centre regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-08-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Preethy Davis filed a suit against Regional Sports Centre seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The matter was settled between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the suit as withdrawn.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as withdrawn due to an out-of-court settlement between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as withdrawn due to an out-of-court settlement between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result suit is dismissed as withdrawn.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Preethy Davis
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Regional Sports Centre
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abraham Markos
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Chandapillai Abraham.P.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
John Vithayathil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aibel Mathew Siby
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.N.Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Viswanath Salish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prabha Murali Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amal A.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The plaintiff sought to dismiss the suit as withdrawn due to settlement between the parties.
Evidence:
the matter was settled between the parties and sought to dispose the suit as withdrawn due to settlement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Preethy Davis vs Regional Sports Centre regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Preethy Davis vs Regional Sports Centre regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won