Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 49/2025

Case between Preethi S vs Nusail Ashraf et al regarding condonation of delay in filing IA 18/2025

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition filed by defendants Nusail Ashraf, Antony Joshy, and Vijeesh Vijayan seeking to condone a delay in filing a petition to set aside an ex parte order. The plaintiff Preethi S argues that the petition is not maintainable since a decree has already been passed in the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the defendants' petition to condone the delay in filing a petition to set aside the ex parte order since the reason provided was not sufficient.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Preethi S (Age not specified years) Rishikesh House, No. 31 A, Railview Lane, Bye Lane, Patteripuram P.O, Aluva

Defendants

Nusail Ashraf (Age not specified years) Flat No. C2, Block No. 4, VB Garden, Pilikkillam West Road, Chembumukk, Satellite P.O, Kakkanad Antony Joshy (Age not specified years) Flat No. G2, Block No. 4, VB Garden, Pilikkillam West Road, Chembumukk, Satellite P.O, Kakkanad Vijeesh Vijayan (Age not specified years) Flat No. B2, Block No. 3, VB Garden, Pilikkillam West Road, Chembumukk, Satellite P.O, Kakkanad

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioners sought to condone the delay for setting aside an ex parte order in I.A. 2/2025 regarding mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
the petition herein cannot be positively entertained and is therefore be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases