Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 49/2025

Case between Preethi S vs Nusail Ashraf et al regarding condonation of delay in filing IA 18/2025

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-25
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition filed by defendants Nusail Ashraf, Antony Joshy, and Vijeesh Vijayan seeking to condone a delay in filing a petition to set aside an ex parte order. The plaintiff Preethi S argues that the petition is not maintainable since a decree has already been passed in the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the defendants' petition to condone the delay in filing a petition to set aside the ex parte order since the reason provided was not sufficient.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the defendants' petition to condone the delay in filing a petition to set aside the ex parte order since the reason provided was not sufficient.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The court found the reason for the delay not valid as it did not meet the required legal standards.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Preethi S
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nusail Ashraf
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony Joshy
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vijeesh Vijayan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Paulson M.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shabeela P. M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswin Kailas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Tobias Benny
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Varghese P. Chacko
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dennis Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Naveen T.U
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioners sought to condone the delay for setting aside an ex parte order in I.A. 2/2025 regarding mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
the petition herein cannot be positively entertained and is therefore be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Preethi S vs Nusail Ashraf et al regarding condonation of delay in filing IA 18/2025
Case Code Year
Case between Preethi S vs Nusail Ashraf et al regarding condonation of delay in filing IA 18/2025

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won