Case Summary
The case involves Preetha Kumari V.N as the plaintiff and Joseph Pius Gomez as the defendant. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the court dismissing the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence. There was no representation for the plaintiff during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Preetha Kumari V.N
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joseph Pius Gomez
- Party Age
- 67
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Marackal A. Gopalakrishnan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. V. K. Manju
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.Williams
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Niju.K. Raj
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2020