Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1008/2005

Case between Praveen Kumar vs Sobhana, Peethambaran regarding civil suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-28
Duration
approximately-20 years
Case Closed
Tue, 10/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Praveen Kumar, the plaintiff, filed a civil suit against Sobhana and Peethambaran. The court found that the parties reached a settlement through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in accordance with the mediation agreement reached by both parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee under section 69A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in accordance with the mediation agreement reached by both parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found to be lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement is found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed in accordance with mediation agreement. Mediation agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Praveen Kumar
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sobhana
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Peethambaran
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K R Mohanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in accordance with mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed in accordance with mediation agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee under section 69A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee under section 69A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Praveen Kumar vs Sobhana, Peethambaran regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Praveen Kumar vs Sobhana, Peethambaran regarding civil suit

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2005 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 10/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won