Case Summary
Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments PvtLtd. filed a suit against Vinu Kumar V.C and Jiji V Manzil. The suit was dismissed for default as both parties were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of both parties during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments PvtLtd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vinu Kumar V.C
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jiji V Manzil
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.Paul Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anjana Sugunan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.V.Sanosh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G.Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gayathri Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments PvtLtd. vs Vinu Kumar V.C et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments PvtLtd. vs Vinu Kumar V.C et al regarding dismissal for default.