Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 39 /2021

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Sweety Roshit et al regarding default dismissal

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-03-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff is Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd., represented by its Chairman, Anson K Maliakkal. The defendants are Sweety Roshit and Roshit A K. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default because the plaintiff did not appear or provide representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default. All interim orders stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) 5th Floor, Marine Drive, Ernakulam, Kochi- 682011

Defendants

Sweety Roshit (38 years) Adimathara House, Elankunnapuzha P O, Vypin, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682503 Roshit A K (46 years) Adimathara House, Elankunnapuzha P O, Vypin, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682503

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases