Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1142/2020

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Renjith T et al regarding money recovery

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-10-09
Duration
approximately-13 years 3 months
Case Closed
Wed, 10/09/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd., is seeking payment from the defendants Renjith T and Deepa Renjith for defaulting on a chitty subscription. The defendants participated in the chitty scheme but failed to pay the required amounts despite repeated demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay a total of ₹1,04,796 along with interest. The defendants' claims were not substantiated, leading to the acceptance of the plaintiff's case.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of ₹1,04,796 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay a total of ₹1,04,796 along with interest. The defendants' claims were not substantiated, leading to the acceptance of the plaintiff's case.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's evidence was not countered, and the defendants failed to appear in court, leading the court to accept the plaintiff's claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's evidence was not countered, and the defendants failed to appear in court, leading the court to accept the plaintiff's claims.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence tendered by the PW1 is not countered by any sort of cross-examination. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹1,04,796 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renjith T
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepa Renjith
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Resolution No. 49, Application to receive the Chitty Amount, Chitty Surety Agreement, Receipt, Demand Notice of Defendant No.1, Demand Notice of Defendant No. 2, Postal Receipts (2 Nos), True Copy of Lawyer Notice, Reply Notice, Computer Print Out of Account Statement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. Paul Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kurian Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Akhil Alexios Kanakattu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover amount due from defendants.
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 1,04,796/- (Rupees one lakh four thousand seven hundred ninety six only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Resolution authorizing legal action.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Application to receive the Chitty Amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Chitty Surety agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement securing the chitty amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt for the transaction related to the chitty.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice demanding repayment from Defendant No.1.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice demanding repayment from Defendant No.2.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipts for postal communication regarding demands.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of postal communication.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of postal communication.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of the lawyer's notice sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of postal communication.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of postal communication.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's acknowledgment of defendant's response.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Computer printout detailing the account status.
Reference:
Ext.A14

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Renjith T et al regarding money recovery
Case Code Year
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Renjith T et al regarding money recovery

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 06/14/2011 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 10/09/2024 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Maker Village vs M/s. V Robotics Innovations Private Limited et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bajaj Electricals Limited vs Viswas Marketting Agencies regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Southern Phosphate & Mineral vs Mahavishnu Agro Service regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between PREFire Solutions vs Ernakulam Tourist Bungalow et al regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s M D George and Company vs M/s Zillion Infrastructure (P) Ltd. regarding realization of money and mandatory injunction.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won