Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.883/2018

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Prasanth.T.S. regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-23
Duration
approximately-5 years 8 months 7 days
Case Closed
Sat, 03/23/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit against Prasanth.T.S. for the realization of a defaulted amount related to a chitty transaction. The defendant defaulted on payments and a cheque issued for settlement was dishonored.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partially decreed the suit, directing the defendant to pay Rs.5,000 along with interest from the last installment due date. The defendant's other defenses regarding payments were not substantiated.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant shall pay Rs.5,000 along with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court partially decreed the suit, directing the defendant to pay Rs.5,000 along with interest from the last installment due date. The defendant's other defenses regarding payments were not substantiated.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established that the defendant owes Rs. 1,01,165 to the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that plaintiff has established that defendant owes Rs. 1,01,165 to plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed in part on the following terms: Defendant shall pay Rs.5,000 along with interest @9% from 11.08.2015 till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasanth.T.S.
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Resolution No.33, Agreement dated 11.04.2012, Bond executed by defendant, Demand notice dated 16.07.2015, Certified copy of dishonor memo dated 11.12.2015.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. Paul Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Desi Mathai
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jiji K. Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Lovely K.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Recovery of Rs.5,000/- with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
Accordingly I am satisfied that plaintiff is entitled to realize the last installment of Rs.5,000/- which was defaulted on 11.08.2015 with interest.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorization for the accountant of plaintiff company to conduct case and adduce evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement between plaintiff and defendant regarding the chitty transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Bond
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Bond executed by defendant in favour of plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Application for sanction of chitty amount submitted by defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt acknowledging the receipt of Rs.1,90,000/- by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Promissory note issued by defendant for the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of demand notice issued by plaintiff to defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt related to the demand notice.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment card related to the demand notice.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of cheque issued by the defendant for settlement.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Dishonor memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of dishonor memo for the cheque issued by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Judgment Copy
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of judgment in CC 1277/16 of Negotiable Instruments Act Court.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Prasanth.T.S. regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Prasanth.T.S. regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 03/23/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/23/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Midhun Mohan.A vs Cherian Mathew et al regarding realization of money.
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Sri. Arvind Kumar regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s A.M. Distributors vs Mr. Tejpal Singh, regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff's Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Neptune Readymix Concrete (Pvt) Ltd. vs Mr. Mathew Thomas regarding realization of money.
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Maniamkot Advertising India Pvt Ld., et al vs Nadarajan regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won