Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 218/2023

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Manoj K Mathew regarding service of summons.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-10-14
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. as the plaintiff and Manoj K Mathew as the defendant. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's failure to serve summons despite multiple chances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff's case was dismissed due to their failure to take steps to serve summons.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not take necessary actions to serve the defendant with summons.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 14.10.2024 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Steps not taken to serve summons despite numerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) Head Office: 5th Floor, Marine Drive, Ernakulam, Kochi – 682 011

Defendants

Manoj K Mathew (45 years years) Now residing at PJRA – 205, P.J Antony Road, Palarivattom, Ernakulam 682 025.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases