Case Summary
The case involves Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. as the plaintiff and Manoj K Mathew as the defendant. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's failure to serve summons despite multiple chances.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's case was dismissed due to their failure to take steps to serve summons.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not take necessary actions to serve the defendant with summons.
The plaintiff did not take necessary actions to serve the defendant with summons.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not take necessary actions to serve the defendant with summons.
The plaintiff did not take necessary actions to serve the defendant with summons.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff represented. Steps not taken to serve summons despite numerous chances.
Judgment Evidence:
This suit have been came up before me for hearing on 14.10.2024 and the court on the same day delivered the following: Steps not taken to serve summons despite numerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd.
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manoj K Mathew
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M Paul Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.V Sanosh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anjana Sugunan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Manoj K Mathew regarding service of summons.
Case Code Year
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Manoj K Mathew regarding service of summons.