Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 151/2023

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt Ltd. vs Joy P.P et al regarding money recovery

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
approximately-2 years 5 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt Ltd., is seeking to recover money from the defendants, Joy P.P and Paul M.V, due to their default in payments under a chit fund agreement. The defendants have contested the suit, claiming that the plaintiff lacks legal standing.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay a sum of ₹2,06,632 along with interest. Additionally, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount from the defendants' assets in case of default.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants ordered to pay ₹2,06,632 with 9% interest per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay a sum of ₹2,06,632 along with interest. Additionally, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount from the defendants' assets in case of default.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved the existence of a legal obligation and default by the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved the existence of a legal obligation and default by the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit as well as documents would satisfactorily answer these issues in favour of the plaintiff especially considering the fact that there is no evidence to substantiate the pleadings of the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 2,06,632/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Six Thousand Six Hundred and Thirty-Two only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt Ltd.
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joy P.P
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paul M.V
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Resolution no.13 authorizing N.V.Saseendran to conduct the case, Chitty Surety Agreement executed by the defendants, Receipt signed by the defendants, Office copy of the lawyer notice issued by the plaintiff to the defendants, Returned legal notice along with Acknowledgment card
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.Paul Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.V.Sanosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anjana Sugunan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.A.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of the amount due from the defendants.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay an amount of 2,06,632/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Six Thousand Six Hundred and Thirty-Two only), with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the litigation.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to the costs of the litigation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorized N.V.Saseendran to conduct the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Chitty Surety agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendants for the chit transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Signed by the defendants to acknowledge the transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Office copy of the lawyer notice issued to the defendants demanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Returned Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned legal notice along with acknowledgment card.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt Ltd. vs Joy P.P et al regarding money recovery
Case Code Year
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt Ltd. vs Joy P.P et al regarding money recovery

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 02/10/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won