Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 214/2023

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Jose Lal regarding suit rejection

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-01-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Pratheeksha Kuries and investments Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit against Jose Lal. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and the court rejected the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court pronounced the judgment in open court, stating that the suit was rejected due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 19th day of January, 2024.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Pratheeksha Kuries and investments Pvt. Ltd. (Age not specified years) Marine Drive, Ernakulam, Kochi- 682 011

Defendants

Jose Lal (40 years years) Payyappilly House, Vattekunnam, Edapally North P.O, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-payment of court fees.
Evidence:
Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases