Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1086/2022

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Ansad S.M regarding settlement of a civil suit.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-12-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Ansad S.M. The suit has been settled through mediation and the terms have been decreed by the court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the terms of the mediation agreement and decreed the suit accordingly.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the terms of the mediation agreement and decreed the suit accordingly.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation agreement were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of the mediation agreement found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ansad S.M
Party Age
47
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation Report
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.V.Sanosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishna Prasad S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sindhu S Kamath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Swapna S.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rohini Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Suraj Kumar D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement
Evidence:
Hence Suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Ansad S.M regarding settlement of a civil suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Ansad S.M regarding settlement of a civil suit.

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won