Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 84 of 2021

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Anilkumar V.G regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-03-21
Duration
approximately-4 years 3 months 1 day
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd., is seeking to recover money from the defendant, Anilkumar V.G., for unpaid chitty installments. The defendant failed to make the required payments despite multiple demands from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding amount along with interest. The plaintiff successfully proved their claims through unrefuted evidence.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff company is allowed to recover Rs.90,652 along with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding amount along with interest. The plaintiff successfully proved their claims through unrefuted evidence.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff company proved their claim with unrefuted evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff company proved their claim with unrefuted evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted evidence of PW1 and from Exts.A1 to A11 documents the plaint averments stands proved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff company is allowed to recover Rs.90,652 (Rupees Ninety thousand Six hundred and Fifty Two only) together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till entire realization in full from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd.
Relation
represented by its Chairman Sri. Anson.K.Maliakkal
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anilkumar V.G
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of the Resolution No.10, Certified copy of certificate of incorporation, Application by the defendant to receive the Chitty amount, Chitty surety agreement, Receipt signed by the defendant, Blank cheque bearing No. 131285, Office copy of the demand notice, Postal receipt, Office copy of the lawyer notice, Account statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
N.P Sethu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of outstanding chitty installments from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff company is allowed to recover Rs.90,652/(Rupees Ninety thousand Six hundred and Fifty Two only) together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff company is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Chitty Surety agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the chitty installments.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt signed by the defendant acknowledging the chitty transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Blank Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque provided by the defendant as security for future installments.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendant demanding payment for missed installments.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formal notice sent by the plaintiff's lawyer requesting payment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Anilkumar V.G regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Anilkumar V.G regarding realisation of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 03/20/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won