Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 658/2024

Case between Prathap Chandran et al vs Veena Varghese et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-06-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are Prathap Chandran and Keerthana, while the defendants are Veena Varghese and Basil James. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their lack of interest in proceeding with the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and their lack of interest in the proceeding. Notices to the plaintiffs were returned undelivered.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs demonstrated no interest in continuing the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Prathap Chandran (53 years years) Melveetil house, 7/440, Vadakkancherry, Thrissur District – 680 553 Keerthana (30 years years) C/o Santhakumari, Mankoottathil house, Udayamperoor, Ernakulam – 682 307

Defendants

Veena Varghese (28 years years) Kokkaravalel house, Vadayampady Post, Ailaranad south, Ernakulam – 682 308 Basil James (35 years years) Kokkaravelel house, Vadayampady post, Ailaranad south, Ernakulam – 682 308

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of interest in proceeding.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. Defendant represented. Counsel for the plaintiff had already submitted before this court that there is no instructions from the plaintiff. ... Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases