Case Summary
The plaintiffs are Prathap Chandran and Keerthana, while the defendants are Veena Varghese and Basil James. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and their lack of interest in proceeding with the case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' absence and their lack of interest in the proceeding. Notices to the plaintiffs were returned undelivered.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs demonstrated no interest in continuing the suit.
The plaintiffs demonstrated no interest in continuing the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs demonstrated no interest in continuing the suit.
The plaintiffs demonstrated no interest in continuing the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Defendant represented. Counsel for the plaintiff had already submitted before this court that there is no instructions from the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prathap Chandran
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Keerthana
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Veena Varghese
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Basil James
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Mohammed Rafeeq
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Law Firm
- Rights Associates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E.P.Sanaldev
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Law Firm
- Rights Associates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amarnath R Lal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Law Firm
- Rights Associates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Beena N Kartha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Arunchand
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Gopika Gopal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Akhila Hussain Z
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of interest in proceeding.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. Defendant represented. Counsel for the plaintiff had already submitted before this court that there is no instructions from the plaintiff. ... Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prathap Chandran et al vs Veena Varghese et al regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Prathap Chandran et al vs Veena Varghese et al regarding dismissal for default.