Case Summary
Prasobh kumar and Saritha Prasobh are the plaintiffs. Ani, Unni, Sylajan, and Sarath Chandran @ Byju are the defendants. The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no representation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation.
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation.
Plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation.
Supporting Evidence
As plaintiff is absent and no representation is made.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit stands dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasobh kumar
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saritha Prasobh
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ani
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Unni
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sylajan
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sarath Chandran @ Byju
- Party Age
- 48
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N.Binu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Suit stands dismissed
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prasobh kumar et al vs Ani et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Prasobh kumar et al vs Ani et al regarding dismissal of suit