Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 104/2024

Case between Prasanthan vs Rameesh regarding arrears of rent.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan.B
Order Date
2025-02-17
Duration
approximately-3 years 5 months
Case Closed
Mon, 02/17/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Prasanthan, who is seeking to recover arrears of rent from Rameesh. The court found the plaintiff's claims to be unchallenged, as the defendant was absent during the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover the due rent from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.66,600/- with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing him to recover the due rent from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's claims were undisputed as the defendant did not contest the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's claims were undisputed as the defendant did not contest the case.
Supporting Evidence
On a perusal of plaint, proof affidavit and documents the claim of the plaintiff to realize the money as a part of arrears of rent from the side of defendant stands unchallenged and undisputed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs. The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.66,600/- (Rupees Sixty Six Thousand Six Hundred only) from the side of defendant with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prasanthan
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dinesan Kayyale
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rameesh
Party Age
28
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Rent Agreement dated 17.09.2021, Copy of Lawyer Notice sent by Adv. C. O. Ranjith Kumar to Rameesh, Unclaimed notice sent to defendant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. O. Ranjith Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Lijisha. V. C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover Rs.66,600/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.66,600/- (Rupees Sixty Six Thousand Six Hundred only) from the side of defendant with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till date of realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to receive costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document serves as the basis for the claim of arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendant regarding the arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Unclaimed Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice pertains to the defendant's lack of response.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Prasanthan vs Rameesh regarding arrears of rent.
Case Code Year
Case between Prasanthan vs Rameesh regarding arrears of rent.

Quick Facts

Location
Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 09/17/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 02/17/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thaivacha Madamballi Kunhammadi Haji vs Neelamparambath Mammootty regarding arrears of rent
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between MUHAMMAD HARIS vs KABEER. P regarding mandatory injunction and recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shahabeese P.V. vs Shijin Kumar K.C. regarding mandatory injunction and for realization of arrears of license fee and damages
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kasthurba Mahila Samajam vs Dhanyasree K. regarding mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kasthurba Mahila Samajam vs Dhanyasree K. regarding mandatory injunction
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won