Case Summary
The plaintiff Prasad.V.P. is absent and there is no representation. The sole plaintiff is no more and steps have not been taken, resulting in the suit being abated.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been abated due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation made.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit abated. File closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasad.V.P.
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o late Peethambaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kamalaskhi
- Party Age
- 78
- Relation
- W/o Gopalan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sangeeth.C.U.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amritha Jayaram
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Alese Antony Sebastine
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prasad.V.P. vs Kamalaskhi regarding suit abatement due to plaintiff's absence
Case Code Year
Case between Prasad.V.P. vs Kamalaskhi regarding suit abatement due to plaintiff's absence