Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 523/2023

Case between Prasad K.S vs Martin V.X et al regarding a civil dispute.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-08-29
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Prasad K.S, filed a suit against the defendants, Martin V.X and Tony Martin. The court found the plaintiff absent with no representation and rejected the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation or remit the required court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Prasad K.S (48 years) Kalezhath House, Lakshmveedu, Udayamperoor, Manakunnam, Ernakulam-682307

Defendants

Martin V.X (55 years) Vettaykkal House, Melothkadam Road, Kulayettikkara, Ernakulam-682315 Tony Martin (25 years) Vettaykkal House, Melothkadam Road, Kulayettikkara, Ernakulam-682315

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
Suit is rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases