Case Summary
The plaintiff, Prasad K.S, filed a suit against the defendants, Martin V.X and Tony Martin. The court found the plaintiff absent with no representation and rejected the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation or remit the required court fee.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation or remit the required court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation or remit the required court fee.
The plaintiff was absent and did not provide representation or remit the required court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent. No representation. No Balance court fee seen remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prasad K.S
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Martin V.X
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tony Martin
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- George Renoy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Akhil.K.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sunil.H
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit is rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Evidence:
Suit is rejected under order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prasad K.S vs Martin V.X et al regarding a civil dispute.
Case Code Year
Case between Prasad K.S vs Martin V.X et al regarding a civil dispute.