Case Summary
The plaintiff Pramod P.B was involved in a suit against the defendant M/s. Latha Printers. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pramod P.B
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Latha Printers
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V T Dinakaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajeev P Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to no representation from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pramod P.B vs M/s. Latha Printers regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Pramod P.B vs M/s. Latha Printers regarding dismissal for default