Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1017/2021

Case between Prameela.S vs Soman.V regarding default dismissal

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-02-10
Duration
Case Code No.
1017
Case Closed
Mon, 02/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Prameela.S and Rajendra Kumar.A, filed a suit against the defendants, Soman.V and Aji.S. The court dismissed the suit for default since neither the plaintiffs nor their representatives were present.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of both plaintiffs and defendants. No representation was made by either party.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of both plaintiffs and defendants. No representation was made by either party.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prameela.S
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajendra Kumar.A
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soman.V
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aji.S
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. L.Satheesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kovalam.B.Ajithkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Kovalam C. Suresh Chandra Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and defendant.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 02/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won