Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 86/2016

Case between Prakashan vs Sree Bhagaval Sahaya Sangham et al regarding abatement of suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-16
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Prakashan, passed away a year prior and his legal heirs decided not to proceed with the suit. As a result, the suit has been declared abated.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff had expired and his legal heirs opted not to continue the suit, leading to its abatement.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is abated. All interim Orders shall stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Prakashan (72 years years) Karunya Bhavan, Ponneth Road, Udayamperur Nadakavu P O, Pin – 682 307, Manakunnam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District.

Defendants

Sree Bhagaval Sahaya Sangham (Age not specified years) Kundannoor, Maradu P O, Pin – 682 304 Kshamavathy (58 years years) Azheekkal Kadavil, Azheekkal P O, Vypin, Pin – 682 508, Puthuvype Village, Kochi Taluk, Ernakulam District. M K Peethambharan (74 years years) Manalodiparambil, Kundannoor, Maradu P O, Pin – 682 304, Maradu Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Abated
Description:
Suit is abated as the legal heirs of the plaintiff do not want to proceed.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff submitted plaintiff expired one year back and Legal heirs of plaintiff does not want to proceed with the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases