Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP/9/2025

Case between Prakashan E K vs Rajan E K et al regarding enforcement of a payment

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-02-10
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Prakashan E K, is seeking enforcement of a payment against the respondents, which include Rajan E K and several others. The court order notes that the property has been delivered and the Execution Petition has been closed.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the delivery of property sought by the petitioner. The Execution Petition has been legally closed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil case
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery of property sought by the petitioner. The Execution Petition has been legally closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found in favor of the petitioner based on the execution proceedings facilitated successfully.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found in favor of the petitioner based on the execution proceedings facilitated successfully.
Supporting Evidence
The court found in favor of the petitioner based on the execution proceedings facilitated successfully.

Judgment Evidence:

Property delivered. F S recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Prakashan E K
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajan E K
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandran E K
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashokan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pramod
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
BINDU
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Chandran E K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Radha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ashokan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Pramod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Karthiyayani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Beena
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bindhu Sunil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sindu E K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sandhya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Biju E K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shyni E K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanjay E K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prakashan E K vs Rajan E K et al regarding enforcement of a payment
Case Code Year
Case between Prakashan E K vs Rajan E K et al regarding enforcement of a payment

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between null vs null regarding null
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Unknown
Case between JDs vs null regarding decree debt
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Kavilumpara Rural Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society et al vs Ranjith A et al regarding EP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Plaintiff Won
Case between IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD et al vs KUNHIRAMAN et al regarding default dismissal.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Defendant Won
Case between Vinodan NIRAN V G vs Vijayan regarding EP dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Defendant Won