Case Summary
The petitioner, P.Rajeswari Thankachy, filed a suit against Anitha.D.S and others seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and eviction from the plaint schedule property. The case involves issues of ownership, possession, and alleged wrongful eviction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The respondent is restrained from inducting strangers in plaint A schedule property and plaint B to E schedule building and from obstructing the petitioner from entering into the plaint A schedule property and her right of residence in plaint B schedule building.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The application for injunction was allowed, restraining the defendants from inducting strangers into the property and obstructing the plaintiff’s right to residence.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner has a life interest reserved in the plaint B schedule building, and the documents produced substantiate her apprehensions regarding eviction.
The petitioner has a life interest reserved in the plaint B schedule building, and the documents produced substantiate her apprehensions regarding eviction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner has a life interest reserved in the plaint B schedule building, and the documents produced substantiate her apprehensions regarding eviction.
The petitioner has a life interest reserved in the plaint B schedule building, and the documents produced substantiate her apprehensions regarding eviction.
Supporting Evidence
It is evident that a life interest was preserved in favour of petitioner in the plaint B schedule building. The petitioner has the right to reside in the plaint B schedule building comprised in plaint A schedule property.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result this application is allowed as follows: 1) The respondent is restrained from inducting strangers in plaint A schedule property and plaint B to E schedule building and from obstructing the petitioner from entering into the plaint A schedule property and her right of residence in plaint B schedule building.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.Rajeswari Thankachy
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anitha.D.S
- Relation
- W/o Selvakumar
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pranav.A.S
- Relation
- S/o Late P.Sivaprasad
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajesh.M
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shiny
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of protection order, Copy of impleading petition, Copy of judgment in OS.1001/2019, Copy of appeal memorandum in AS.236/2022, Copy of complaints before various authorities.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Anil Kumar.V.C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Rajeswari.R.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.R.K.Harikrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Sivaprasad.V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petitioner sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the respondents from inducting strangers and obstructing her possession.
Evidence:
The present application can be allowed restraining the respondents from inducting strangers in plaint A schedule property and plaint B to E schedule building and from obstructing the petitioner from entering into the plaint A schedule property and her right of residence in plaint B schedule building.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Protection Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a copy of the protection order obtained by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Impleading Petition
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a copy of the impleading petition filed by the petitioner.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Judgment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a copy of the judgment in O.S.1001/2019.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Appeal Memorandum
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a copy of the appeal memorandum in A.S.236/2022.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Complaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a copy of the complaint before Fort Station House Officer dated 14/07/2022.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a copy of the receipt issued by Station House Officer, Fort Police Station dated 14/07/2022.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type:
Complaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a copy of the complaint before Additional Director General of Police dated 15/02/2023.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is the original receipt issued by Superintendent of Police, Special Cell dated 15/02/2023.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type:
Complaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a copy of the complaint before Assistant Commissioner, Fort police station dated 22/02/2025.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type:
Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a copy of the receipt issued by Fort Sub Divisional Office of Police dated 22/02/2025.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type:
Complaint
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document is a copy of the complaint before DGP cum State Police Chief dated 24/03/2025.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2025