Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 951 /2019

Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-06-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Pradeep filed a suit against defendants Sumesh Balakrishnan and Aiswarya. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and showed no interest in proceeding.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence. All interim orders were vacated.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence. All interim orders were vacated.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not show interest to proceed with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not show interest to proceed with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default. All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pradeep
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o K R Nathan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sumesh Balakrishnan
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o K A Balakrishnan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aiswarya
Party Age
34
Relation
W/o Sumesh Balakrishnan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jani A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saju Wahab
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aswin Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anwin Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kala G Nambiar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amal Nath Naik
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Renoy Vincent
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Niranjan Sudhir
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to proceed with suit. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won