Case Summary
The case involves a property dispute between the plaintiffs Prabhakaran Nair and Rajeswari, and the defendants Parukutty Amma Santhamma et al. The defendants filed applications related to the counter claim concerning a property originally bequeathed through a will.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the applications filed by the defendants regarding the counter claim. It was determined that the applications were belated and did not provide sufficient grounds for removal from the court list.
Key Reasoning:
The court found the applications to be belated and without merit.
The court found the applications to be belated and without merit.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The present application is highly belated. Hence for the aforesaid reasons I am not inclined to allow the present application.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, these applications are dismissed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prabhakaran Nair
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajeswari
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Parukutty Amma Santhamma
- Party Age
- 81
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- G. Suresh
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- G. Sunil
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- G. Sudha
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Indira
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext.A1, Ext.A2, Ext.A3
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Pathiripally. S. Krishnakumari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Farsana.S.A
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.S. Satheesh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Copy of the plan showing 'Not Final'
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked for reference as it shows the status of the property related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Copy of report of Village Officer
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked for reference to support the petitioner's claims regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Petition filed to correct the error in the extent of property
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked for reference as part of the petitioner's argument.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Prabhakaran Nair vs Parukutty Amma Santhamma et al regarding property dispute
Case Code Year
Case between Prabhakaran Nair vs Parukutty Amma Santhamma et al regarding property dispute