Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1056/2016

Case between P.P. Thomas vs Roslin et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-03-06
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 03/06/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.P. Thomas is the plaintiff who filed the suit, but he was absent during the hearing. The defendants were present, and as a result, the court dismissed the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by P.P. Thomas was dismissed due to his absence at the hearing. The defendants were present and the court decided in their favor.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by P.P. Thomas was dismissed due to his absence at the hearing. The defendants were present and the court decided in their favor.
Key Reasoning:
The defendant was present while the plaintiff was absent, leading to a dismissal for default.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendant was present while the plaintiff was absent, leading to a dismissal for default.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent. No representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.P. Thomas
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roslin
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashy
Party Age
23
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajith Viswanathan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jenneya Philip
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.N. Sanjith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jaison Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Veena Vallikanthan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Archana Ramanan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default with costs of defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.P. Thomas vs Roslin et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between P.P. Thomas vs Roslin et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/06/2024 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won