Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.990/2021

Case between P.P. Jamaludeen et al vs Zemia et al regarding balance court fee

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-05-23
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

P.P. Jamaludeen and Antony Joseph are the plaintiffs, while Zemia and Jaseena are the defendants. The case involves the plaintiffs' failure to remit the balance court fee, leading to the rejection of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiffs' failure to remit the balance court fee despite multiple extensions granted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of the above circumstances, the suit is rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

P.P. Jamaludeen (48 years) Thenampazhath House, Kanjiramattom, Pin 682315 Antony Joseph (24 years) Ambattu Jose Villa, Kureekadu Desom, Pin 682305

Defendants

Zemia (26 years) Mathilakath House, Kothakulam, Valappad P.O, Thrissur, Pin 680567 Jaseena (48 years) Mathilakath House, Kothakulam, Valappad P.O, Thrissur, Pin 680567

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit was rejected due to the balance court fee not being remitted.
Evidence:
In the light of the above circumstances, the suit is rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases