Case Summary
The plaintiff, Popular Associates, is seeking a decree for recovery of a sum due from the defendants, Hinduja Leyland Finance Ltd. The case revolves around the failure of the defendants to pay the amount for services rendered by the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.66,694/- with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the sum due along with interest. Additional costs of the suit were also awarded to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged and satisfactorily proved the claim.
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged and satisfactorily proved the claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged and satisfactorily proved the claim.
The evidence of the plaintiff remained unchallenged and satisfactorily proved the claim.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 and the documents produced by him remains unchallenged. As such, I find that the plaintiff had proved his case and is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.66,694/- (Rupees sixty six thousand six hundred and ninety four only) with interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Popular Associates
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sornam Pillai
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bhagath.K
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of collection agency agreement, Bill issued from Popular Associate, Copy of lawyer notice sent by Plaintiff advocate to defendant, Postal receipts
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.T.Dileep
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay the amount due to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.66,694/- (Rupees sixty six thousand six hundred and ninety four only) with interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiff.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Collection Agency Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
To substantiate the plaintiff's claim regarding his role as a collection agent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Bill
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
To show the charges incurred by the plaintiff for the repossession of vehicles.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
To evidence the demand made by the plaintiff for the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Postal Receipts
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
To verify the sending of the lawyer's notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Popular Associates, et al vs Sornam Pillai, et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Popular Associates, et al vs Sornam Pillai, et al regarding realisation of money