Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 20 of 2012

Case between Poochengal Pathumma vs Kooniyil Ismail et al regarding exparte decree

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2016-12-08
Duration
4 years 1 month 19 days
Case Closed
Thu, 12/08/2016 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner Poochengal Pathumma filed a petition to set aside an exparte decree against the respondents.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The interlocutory application to set aside the exparte decree was dismissed due to non-payment of costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Dismissal of Interlocutory Application
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The interlocutory application to set aside the exparte decree was dismissed due to non-payment of costs.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the IA is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Poochengal Pathumma
Party Age
62
Relation
Daughter of Muhammedkutty @ Kunhapputty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kooniyil Ismail
Party Age
35
Relation
Son of Kunhimuhammed Haji
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulaiman
Party Age
40
Relation
Son of Muhammedkutty @ Kunhapputty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdulla
Party Age
49
Relation
Son of Muhammedkutty @ Kunhapputty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sainaba
Party Age
43
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rukhiya
Party Age
36
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mymoona
Party Age
41
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Annachamppalli Kunhimoideen @ Kunhu
Party Age
66
Relation
Son of Moideen Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Set Aside Exparte Decree
Outcome: Dismissal of Interlocutory Application
Description:
Petitioner's application to set aside an exparte decree was dismissed.
Evidence:
No costs has been paid as per the order date 19-10-2016. Hence the IA is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Poochengal Pathumma vs Kooniyil Ismail et al regarding exparte decree
Case Code Year
Case between Poochengal Pathumma vs Kooniyil Ismail et al regarding exparte decree

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sat, 12/08/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 12/08/2016 - 12:00
From
Thu, 12/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Sat, 12/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
0%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vineeshkumar et al vs Kumaran regarding compliance with High Court directions
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V.K.Savithry Amma vs Marakkar et al regarding unknown
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vallikkadan Ibrahim Musliar vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding default judgment
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kalathil Prabhakaran vs Leela.K.Nair et al regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won