Case Summary
The plaintiffs, including P.N.Satheesan and P.N.Surendran, were involved in a suit against defendants including Narayana Pillai K.V. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were absent and not represented.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiffs' absence and lack of representation. No proof affidavit was filed by the plaintiffs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and were not represented, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiffs failed to appear and were not represented, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs failed to appear and were not represented, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiffs failed to appear and were not represented, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, not represented. Defendant 3, Defendant 6 represented.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence Suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.N.Satheesan
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.N.Surendran
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.N.Sureshan @ P.N.Suresh
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.N.Mohanan
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Narayana Pillai K.V
- Party Age
- 88
- Relation
- Nephew of
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.N.Sivan
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shamsudeen K.M
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thomas Luke Pattarkalam
- Party Age
- 38
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anu Anne Thomas
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.S.Maya
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sunitha K.A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- N.S.Mohammed Usman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.Priya Devi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Latheesh Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Binitha James
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Dileepan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vipin Kumr K.B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Hence Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.N.Satheesan et al vs Narayana Pillai K.V et al regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between P.N.Satheesan et al vs Narayana Pillai K.V et al regarding default dismissal