Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OP.(Indigent) 02/2022

Case between P.Nagendran et al vs N.S. Radhakrishnan et al regarding Indigent petition

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, P.Nagendran and Santhamma, are involved in an indigent petition case against the counter petitioners N.S. Radhakrishnan and Sreeja. The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the petitioners.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioners. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Indigent
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioners. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since, the petitioner is neither present nor represented, the petition is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.Nagendran
Party Age
85
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santhamma
Party Age
75
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N.S. Radhakrishnan
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreeja
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Poonthura Tharif.B.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri .Kulathoor N. Mohanakumaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.V.S. Ratheesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.S. Satheesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed for default due to the petitioner's absence.
Evidence:
the petition is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Indigent
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.Nagendran et al vs N.S. Radhakrishnan et al regarding Indigent petition
Case Code Year
Case between P.Nagendran et al vs N.S. Radhakrishnan et al regarding Indigent petition

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreedevi vs Mahesh regarding realization of money
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Application in Pauper Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between R.Vijayakumar vs Arun Mohan regarding possession of petition schedule building
Rent Control Court
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashraf Ali vs Badhusha regarding rent control petition
COURT OF RENT CONTROL
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won