Case Summary
P.K. Abdul Hameed is the decree holder seeking an amendment to the execution petition. Sayyed Abdul Khadar, the judgment debtor, is disputing the difference in the amount to be recovered as occupational charges.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Amendment to the execution petition allowed.
Case Type
Execution Application
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for amendment to the execution petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The amendment sought to be incorporated would not adversely affect the interest of the Judgment Debtor.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed. Carryout amendment as sought for in the petition within 7 days.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- P.K. Abdul Hameed
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sayyed Abdul Khadar
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Darly M. Sebastian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Samsan Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition is allowed. Carryout amendment as sought for in the petition within 7 days
Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Application
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between P.K. Abdul Hameed vs Sayyed Abdul Khadar regarding amendment of execution petition
Case Code Year
Case between P.K. Abdul Hameed vs Sayyed Abdul Khadar regarding amendment of execution petition