Case Summary
The plaintiffs, P.J.Jacob and Sosamma Jacob, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Aswathy Shaji, who has made unlawful demands and threatened them regarding their son's alleged relationship with her. The defendant has visited the plaintiffs' property multiple times, causing them distress and fear of unlawful trespass.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant her men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from interfering with the peaceful possession of plaintiffs over the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The affidavit and documents produced by the plaintiffs satisfactorily proved their case regarding the unlawful demands and threats made by the defendant.
The affidavit and documents produced by the plaintiffs satisfactorily proved their case regarding the unlawful demands and threats made by the defendant.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. Defendant her men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from interfering with the peaceful possession of plaintiffs over the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
P.J.Jacob (71 years years)
44/1893E, Plavunkal house, Palarivattom, Poonithura village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District
Sosamma Jacob (67 years years)
Plavunkal house, 44/1893E, Palarivattom, Poonithura village, Kanayannur taluk, Ernakulam District
Defendants
Aswathy Shaji (28 years years)
Ettaekal, Thadayinpadu, Peppara, Idukki, presently working at Richmax Finvest, Building no. 53/2267 B2, 1st floor, Vilangadan Arcade, Opposite C.K.C.L.P School, Near Canara Bank, Ponnurunni, Vytila, Pin – 682 019
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendant and her agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Defendant her men and agents are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from interfering with the peaceful possession of plaintiffs over the plaint schedule property.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaintiffs' ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as additional evidence of the plaintiffs' ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Municipal Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further supports the plaintiffs' claims to ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Marked subject to proof but not considered due to lack of subsequent proof.
Reference:
Ext.C1